Okay. So instead of asking everyone individually I thought to ask all of you together.

And guys I've no intention to offence anyone's feelings. Just questions of curious mind.

Why women court is silent? Because Mata sita did gave agnipariksha. And Lakshman rekha was drawn for her. And that has no appropriate answer.

Popular belief is mata sita was exchanged with maya sita and agnipariksha was to get mata sita back.

It is also said that agnipariksha was a test of Mata sita and lord rama's consciousness.

And as for Lakshman rekha? Mata sita had to cross it for dharma.

Now questions are.....

1. If maya sita took real sita's place then why her getting back from agnidev was also not a private affair and was done publically?

2. If mata sita even a deity needed protection from evil eyes for which sita was exchanged with maya sita then what it says about women empowerment? Laxman was also eyed badly by surponekha. Why wasn't he exchanged? Because as a man he could protect himself and mata sita could not?

3. If it was a test to their consciousness, then why mata sita alone entered the fire? Why lord rama didn't accompany her?

4. Mata sita needed to cross Lakshman rekha for dharma as dharma says a saga should not return empty-handed. But why was that line drawn in the first place? Mata sita who lifted the shivdhanus as a child that even mighty warriors failed to lift needed Lakshman rekha for protection?